A second round of reports that Panthers LB Dan Connor could become an Eagle

Update: Howard Eskin threw some cold water on the Connor-to-Philly rumors. Ahhhh, NFL free agency is in the air.  It’s going to be a long day:

Original story:

A week ago, The News Journal’s Geoff Mosher reported that Dan Connor was on the Eagles’ radar:

Several league sources confirmed the team’s interest in the former Penn State All-American, who just finished his fourth season in Carolina, although the degree of interest remains unclear.

At least two sources close to the situation believe Connor, a native of the Delaware County suburb of Wallingford, Pa., is high on the Eagles’ wish list. But one source with direct knowledge of the Eagles’ offseason plans indicated that Connor isn’t their top choice and suggested that it’s less likely to happen, although he did acknowledge that Connor, 26, is someone the team has sought in the past.

All sources interviewed confirmed that the Eagles were interested enough in Connor last August to approach the Panthers about a trade, but Carolina’s uncertainty regarding the health of Pro Bowl middle linebacker Jon Beason made the Panthers reluctant to pull the trigger.

At the time, Beason was nursing foot and leg injuries that caused him to miss preseason time. He ended up tearing his Achilles in the season opener, propelling Connor into the starting role.

If an agreement is reached with the 6-foot-3, 233-pound Connor, the Eagles would start him in the middle, allowing Jamar Chaney to move back to the strong side, where he opened last season and where the team believes he’s best suited.

That report was a bit of a mixed message.  On the one hand, “he’s high on the Eagles wish list,” but on the other, he “isn’t their top choice and suggested it’s less likely to happen.”

Yesterday, it was reported on more of a national level, as CBS’ Pete Prisco reported the same:

If the Eagles sign Connor quickly, that would be an obvious indication that he was indeed “high on the Eagles wish list.”

Connor’s career numbers are less than stellar:

Dan Connor Games Snaps Tackles Sacks FF INT
2008 3 0 (special teams only) 4 0 0 0
2009 16 78 30 0 0 0
2010 8 261 47 1 0 0
2011 15 477 75 0 1 0
Totals 42 816 156 1 1 0

The one positive that stands out is that in 2011, he made 75 tackles in just 477 snaps.  That means he made a tackle on 15.7% of the plays he was on the field.  That’s the good.  The bad is that he hasn’t been able to stay healthy, and hasn’t been much of a playmaker in the opportunities he’s gotten.

Connor is a 2-down player, and would certainly be a nice addition for depth, but it would concern me if the Eagles viewed him as an “answer” at LB, a move that would be reminiscent of the Eagles’ half-hearted fixes at the LB position that fans have been accustomed to in the Andy Reid era. He’d be better at MLB than anything the Eagles currently have on their roster, but that’s a pretty low bar for comparison.

Some of Connor’s game tape after the jump (some good, some bad)…


  1. Just a smiling visitor here to share the love (:, btw great pattern .

  2. Corina says:

    hello my friend. can you provide more information on this?http://www.papajogosmario.com

  3. Thank you for all your labor on this web page. My mother really loves making time for research and it’s really obvious why. My spouse and i learn all concerning the powerful means you render good thoughts on your web site and in addition encourage participation from the others on the point plus our favorite child is certainly becoming educated a great deal. Take advantage of the rest of the new year. You’re conducting a remarkable job.

  4. amoore42 says:


    I’d like to know, given the Stevie Johnson and the Marques Colston contract, is Desean now more likely to sign long-term. They should be setting the market right? So what kind of deal are we looking at for Desean given what’s been happening with other receivers. I guess we’ll have to see what Vincent Jackson gets?

  5. Shaun says:

    Ok so now lets sign more back-up linebackers….geez Andy/Joe/Howie, THIS is what youve had us anticipating for months? Champion- oh crap, thats not happening

  6. Free Plax says:

    Connor is not impresive at all, I would wait to see who else get’s cut or what happens in the draft before signing him.

  7. giants fan says:

    Not particularly impressive.

  8. rage114 says:

    I saw enough. In time, we may be able to be as good as Simoneau.

    1. Tracer Bullet says:

      Oooooh, that’s hateful. Probably accurate, but haaaaaaaaaaateful.

      1. rage114 says:

        I’m being hard on the guy. But it comes from the frustration of having seen this movie before and it doesn’t end any better the nth time seeing it.

        However, if you were to tell me that this guy is their backup and that their real focus is Kuechley, then this does make sense. Kuechley might be the guy they need but the draft is an unknown. He might not be on the board at 15 in which case, they have to have SOME form of a back up plan.

        But if he is the answer, then this is a crappy move in a long list of crappy moves at LB.

%d bloggers like this: