What to do with Albert Haynesworth?

The great Kevin Ewoldt of Hogs Haven reacted to a piece by Tim McManus from Philly Sports Daily regarding the Eagles’ potential interest in Albert Haynesworth.  McManus wrote:

“(The Redskins) are not going to cut (Haynesworth),” said one source with knowledge of the situation. “If the Eagles or anyone else wants him it is going to have to be by trade. Because if they cut him, that’s giving him his way.”

Ewoldt agreed:

It makes sense. It would be a huge disaster to cut Haynesworth and let him play for Philly.

  1. Releasing Haynesworth means he would likely get an incentive-based contract, which means he’d basically be playing in contract-year mode.
  2. Haynesworth of course played with Washburn in Tennessee and had a solid relationship.
  3. Haynesworth vs Rabach two times a year will be a disaster.
  4. Haynesworth has a cheap contract the next 2 seasons. That alone has trade value.

Is everyone on the same page with me that management is doing the right thing shelving Haynesworth? The only way I see this playing out is Haynesworth continuing to disrupt the team with minimal efforts in training camp.

I get Kevin’s 4 points.  They all make sense, and I’ll admit that if I were a Skins fan I might feel the same way.  But at some point you have to kind of stop worrying about “other teams” and do what’s best for your own.  If the Redskins and Eagles were… say… the Patriots and Jets (two teams clearly in a two-team race for the division, and  both SB contenders), then yes, I would agree 100%.  But that’s not the reality.  The Redskins are not going to seriously contend for the Super Bowl this year, so who cares where AH goes?  You can’t let emotion (or in Shanny’s case… ego) cloud reason.

For me, that eliminates reasons 1, 2, and 3.

However, I can certainly get behind reason 4, but I wouldn’t drag it out very long.  As soon as FA gets underway, I’d shop him (that’s sort of a given), and I’d take whatever I can get.  If absolutely no offers come in, I swallow my pride and cut bait.  That would suck, no question, but no way do I let this cancer occupy my hallways for another second, particularly when I just drafted 12 rookies.  The mistake has been made already.  There’s pretty much no way to salvage it at this point.  Why continue to hurt your own team just to spite another?


  1. vnc download says:

    What to do with Albert Haynesworth? – Blogging the bEast Wonderful goods from you, man. I have understand your stuff previous to and you are just extremely great. I really like what you have acquired here, certainly like what you’re saying and the way in which you say it. You make it enjoyable and you still care for to keep it sensible. I can not wait to read much more What to do with Albert Haynesworth? – Blogging the bEast again from you. Thanks For Share .

  2. Tracer Bullet says:

    I can believe they’d hold Haynesworth until the bitter end. If the Bengals and Chargers have taught us anything, it’s that there is ALWAYS someone more concerned about making a point instead of improving his team.

  3. […] There’s rumors about what we’re going to do with Albert, which Kevin Ewoldt from Hogs Haven gives great perspective on here.  But, in classic Philadelphia-style, he was challenged by a blogging Eagles fan who brought up some great Haynesworth points challenging Ewoldt, fun reading nonetheless, read it here. […]

  4. Anders says:

    Also they cant let him ride the bench because that would be a lot of money on the bench and the Redskins dont need the distractions that shelving Hayneworth would give em.

  5. […] stuff from Jimmy over at Blogging The Beast on the Haynesworth situation and what the Skins should do.  He’s absolutely right.  At some point you quit worrying […]

%d bloggers like this: